↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Different classes of antibiotics given to women routinely for preventing infection at caesarean section

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
6 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
232 Mendeley
Title
Different classes of antibiotics given to women routinely for preventing infection at caesarean section
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008726.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gillian ML Gyte, Lixia Dou, Juan C Vazquez

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 232 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 227 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 19%
Student > Bachelor 34 15%
Researcher 30 13%
Student > Postgraduate 18 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 8%
Other 43 19%
Unknown 44 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 120 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 7%
Social Sciences 12 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Other 22 9%
Unknown 45 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2015.
All research outputs
#6,783,328
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,921
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,622
of 368,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#175
of 255 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 255 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.