↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Different classes of antibiotics given to women routinely for preventing infection at caesarean section

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
6 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
216 Mendeley
Title
Different classes of antibiotics given to women routinely for preventing infection at caesarean section
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008726.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gillian ML Gyte, Lixia Dou, Juan C Vazquez

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 211 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 20%
Student > Bachelor 31 14%
Researcher 27 13%
Student > Postgraduate 18 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 8%
Other 42 19%
Unknown 37 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 113 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 7%
Social Sciences 12 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Other 22 10%
Unknown 38 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2015.
All research outputs
#5,875,582
of 22,770,070 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,659
of 12,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,781
of 360,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#175
of 272 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,770,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,537 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 272 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.