| Title |
Interventions for treating inadvertent postoperative hypothermia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009892.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sheryl Warttig, Phil Alderson, Gillian Campbell, Andrew F Smith |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 274 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 270 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 37 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 9% |
| Other | 20 | 7% |
| Researcher | 20 | 7% |
| Other | 63 | 23% |
| Unknown | 81 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 104 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 41 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Psychology | 6 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 27 | 10% |
| Unknown | 86 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2014.
All research outputs
#14,736,622
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,690
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,536
of 370,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#218
of 256 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 256 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.