↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for treating inadvertent postoperative hypothermia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
253 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for treating inadvertent postoperative hypothermia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009892.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sheryl Warttig, Phil Alderson, Gillian Campbell, Andrew F Smith

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 253 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 249 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 15%
Student > Bachelor 27 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 9%
Other 20 8%
Researcher 19 8%
Other 64 25%
Unknown 62 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 101 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 39 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Psychology 6 2%
Computer Science 4 2%
Other 29 11%
Unknown 68 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2014.
All research outputs
#12,713,071
of 22,771,140 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,735
of 12,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,371
of 362,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#219
of 270 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,771,140 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,064 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 270 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.