↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Aspiration of the elbow joint for treating radial head fractures

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
171 Mendeley
Title
Aspiration of the elbow joint for treating radial head fractures
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009949.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thanit Foocharoen, Chingching Foocharoen, Malinee Laopaiboon, Thavatchai Tiamklang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 167 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 22%
Student > Bachelor 25 15%
Student > Postgraduate 15 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 5%
Other 28 16%
Unknown 42 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 11%
Psychology 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 52 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2021.
All research outputs
#3,919,146
of 20,258,946 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,429
of 12,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,673
of 338,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#144
of 246 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,258,946 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,026 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.1. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,702 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 246 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.