↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Strategies of testing for syphilis during pregnancy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
239 Mendeley
Title
Strategies of testing for syphilis during pregnancy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010385.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sadequa Shahrook, Rintaro Mori, Tumendemberel Ochirbat, Harumi Gomi

Abstract

Each year about two million pregnant women are infected with preventable syphilis infection, mostly in developing countries. Despite the expansion of antenatal syphilis screening programmes over the past few decades, syphilis continues to be a major public health concern in developing countries. Point-of-care syphilis testing may be a useful strategy to substantially prevent syphilis-associated perinatal mortality and other negative consequences in resource-poor settings. However, the evidence on effectiveness has been generated mostly from observational study designs or has been reported as a mixed-intervention effect.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 239 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Unknown 237 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 19%
Student > Bachelor 30 13%
Researcher 24 10%
Other 21 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 7%
Other 35 15%
Unknown 66 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 81 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 14%
Social Sciences 16 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 5%
Psychology 5 2%
Other 23 10%
Unknown 69 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2022.
All research outputs
#7,275,632
of 22,957,478 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,839
of 12,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,774
of 261,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#201
of 247 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,957,478 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.6. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 247 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.