| Title |
Strategies of testing for syphilis during pregnancy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010385.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sadequa Shahrook, Rintaro Mori, Tumendemberel Ochirbat, Harumi Gomi |
| Abstract |
Each year about two million pregnant women are infected with preventable syphilis infection, mostly in developing countries. Despite the expansion of antenatal syphilis screening programmes over the past few decades, syphilis continues to be a major public health concern in developing countries. Point-of-care syphilis testing may be a useful strategy to substantially prevent syphilis-associated perinatal mortality and other negative consequences in resource-poor settings. However, the evidence on effectiveness has been generated mostly from observational study designs or has been reported as a mixed-intervention effect. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 292 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 290 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 50 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 10% |
| Researcher | 27 | 9% |
| Other | 25 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 42 | 14% |
| Unknown | 100 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 94 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 35 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 4% |
| Psychology | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 24 | 8% |
| Unknown | 105 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2022.
All research outputs
#8,297,977
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,092
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,681
of 274,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#205
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.