↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Salicylate-containing rubefacients for acute and chronic musculoskeletal pain in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
27 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
195 Mendeley
Title
Salicylate-containing rubefacients for acute and chronic musculoskeletal pain in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007403.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sheena Derry, Paul R L Matthews, Philip J Wiffen, R Andrew Moore

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 193 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 16%
Student > Bachelor 30 15%
Researcher 23 12%
Student > Postgraduate 13 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Other 36 18%
Unknown 48 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Psychology 6 3%
Other 25 13%
Unknown 57 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,240,501
of 22,432,156 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,884
of 12,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,908
of 350,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#67
of 243 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,432,156 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,881 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 243 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.