↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Salicylate-containing rubefacients for acute and chronic musculoskeletal pain in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
28 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
Title
Salicylate-containing rubefacients for acute and chronic musculoskeletal pain in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007403.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sheena Derry, Paul R L Matthews, Philip J Wiffen, R Andrew Moore

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 167 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 19%
Student > Bachelor 27 16%
Researcher 21 12%
Student > Postgraduate 12 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Other 31 18%
Unknown 34 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Psychology 6 4%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 44 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2020.
All research outputs
#962,420
of 17,549,474 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,519
of 11,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,697
of 315,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#68
of 250 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,549,474 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,712 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 250 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.