↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Exercise for vasomotor menopausal symptoms

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
20 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
242 Mendeley
Title
Exercise for vasomotor menopausal symptoms
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006108.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amanda Daley, Helen Stokes-Lampard, Adèle Thomas, Christine MacArthur

Abstract

Evidence suggests that many perimenopausal and early postmenopausal women will experience menopausal symptoms; hot flushes are the most common. Symptoms caused by fluctuating levels of oestrogen may be alleviated by hormone therapy (HT), but a marked global decline in its use has resulted from concerns about the risks and benefits of HT. Consequently, many women are seeking alternatives. As large numbers of women are choosing not to take HT, it is increasingly important to identify evidence-based lifestyle modifications that have the potential to reduce vasomotor menopausal symptoms.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 242 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 240 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 41 17%
Student > Master 39 16%
Researcher 22 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 9%
Student > Postgraduate 13 5%
Other 46 19%
Unknown 59 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 36 15%
Sports and Recreations 11 5%
Psychology 10 4%
Social Sciences 9 4%
Other 35 14%
Unknown 63 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2020.
All research outputs
#891,706
of 17,443,211 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,338
of 11,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,404
of 314,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#66
of 244 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,443,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,692 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.