↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Exercise for vasomotor menopausal symptoms

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
19 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
331 Mendeley
Title
Exercise for vasomotor menopausal symptoms
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006108.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amanda Daley, Helen Stokes-Lampard, Adèle Thomas, Christine MacArthur

Abstract

Evidence suggests that many perimenopausal and early postmenopausal women will experience menopausal symptoms; hot flushes are the most common. Symptoms caused by fluctuating levels of oestrogen may be alleviated by hormone therapy (HT), but a marked global decline in its use has resulted from concerns about the risks and benefits of HT. Consequently, many women are seeking alternatives. As large numbers of women are choosing not to take HT, it is increasingly important to identify evidence-based lifestyle modifications that have the potential to reduce vasomotor menopausal symptoms.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 331 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 329 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 53 16%
Student > Master 51 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 8%
Researcher 23 7%
Student > Postgraduate 16 5%
Other 59 18%
Unknown 104 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 93 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 49 15%
Psychology 14 4%
Sports and Recreations 14 4%
Social Sciences 13 4%
Other 39 12%
Unknown 109 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,164,316
of 21,815,602 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,729
of 12,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,183
of 348,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#68
of 238 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,815,602 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,115 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 238 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.