↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Psychosocial interventions to reduce alcohol consumption in concurrent problem alcohol and illicit drug users

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
Title
Psychosocial interventions to reduce alcohol consumption in concurrent problem alcohol and illicit drug users
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009269.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan Klimas, Helen Tobin, Catherine‐Anne Field, Clodagh SM O'Gorman, Liam G Glynn, Eamon Keenan, Jean Saunders, Gerard Bury, Colum Dunne, Walter Cullen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 181 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 20%
Student > Master 29 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 12%
Student > Bachelor 17 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 39 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 22%
Psychology 30 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 16%
Social Sciences 12 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 2%
Other 15 8%
Unknown 52 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2018.
All research outputs
#1,667,218
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,567
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,992
of 368,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#84
of 257 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,625 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 257 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.