↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Non‐pharmacological interventions for chronic pain in people with spinal cord injury

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
159 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
809 Mendeley
Title
Non‐pharmacological interventions for chronic pain in people with spinal cord injury
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009177.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Inga Boldt, Inge Eriks‐Hoogland, Martin WG Brinkhof, Rob de Bie, Daniel Joggi, Erik von Elm

Abstract

Chronic pain is frequent in persons living with spinal cord injury (SCI). Conventionally, the pain is treated pharmacologically, yet long-term pain medication is often refractory and associated with side effects. Non-pharmacological interventions are frequently advocated, although the benefit and harm profiles of these treatments are not well established, in part because of methodological weaknesses of available studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 809 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 4 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
France 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 799 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 130 16%
Student > Master 129 16%
Researcher 82 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 56 7%
Other 133 16%
Unknown 216 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 194 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 107 13%
Psychology 107 13%
Neuroscience 51 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 3%
Other 77 10%
Unknown 247 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2022.
All research outputs
#5,025,961
of 26,123,112 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,242
of 13,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,368
of 373,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#153
of 261 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,123,112 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.6. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 261 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.