↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Restricted versus liberal water intake for preventing morbidity and mortality in preterm infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
16 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
Title
Restricted versus liberal water intake for preventing morbidity and mortality in preterm infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000503.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edward F Bell, Michael J Acarregui

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 194 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 15%
Researcher 29 14%
Student > Bachelor 24 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 12%
Student > Postgraduate 20 10%
Other 44 22%
Unknown 30 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 112 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 13 6%
Unknown 46 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2018.
All research outputs
#1,084,641
of 18,478,499 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,730
of 11,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,319
of 320,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#77
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,478,499 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,838 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.