↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Restricted versus liberal water intake for preventing morbidity and mortality in preterm infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
150 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
289 Mendeley
Title
Restricted versus liberal water intake for preventing morbidity and mortality in preterm infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000503.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edward F Bell, Michael J Acarregui

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 289 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 282 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 12%
Student > Master 34 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 11%
Student > Bachelor 26 9%
Other 24 8%
Other 55 19%
Unknown 85 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 138 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 7%
Social Sciences 6 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 1%
Other 17 6%
Unknown 100 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2023.
All research outputs
#2,008,170
of 25,913,612 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,154
of 13,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,208
of 370,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#98
of 256 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,913,612 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,163 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,564 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 256 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.