↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Double-bundle versus single-bundle reconstruction for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
132 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
219 Mendeley
Title
Double-bundle versus single-bundle reconstruction for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008413.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thavatchai Tiamklang, Sermsak Sumanont, Thanit Foocharoen, Malinee Laopaiboon

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Andorra 1 <1%
Unknown 212 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 38 17%
Student > Master 33 15%
Student > Postgraduate 22 10%
Researcher 20 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 9%
Other 48 22%
Unknown 38 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 103 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 11%
Sports and Recreations 10 5%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Psychology 4 2%
Other 24 11%
Unknown 47 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2020.
All research outputs
#10,152,953
of 17,353,889 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,480
of 11,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,185
of 313,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#209
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,353,889 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.