↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Methenamine hippurate for preventing urinary tract infections

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
6 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
113 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Methenamine hippurate for preventing urinary tract infections
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003265.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bon San B Lee, Tushar Bhuta, Judy M Simpson, Jonathan C Craig

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 143 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 16%
Other 20 14%
Student > Bachelor 19 13%
Researcher 16 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 37 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 39 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,248,232
of 23,009,818 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,875
of 12,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,998
of 176,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#53
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,009,818 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,351 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.