↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for central sleep apnoea in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for central sleep apnoea in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012889
Authors

Daniela V Pachito, Ana Luiza C Martimbianco, Carolina OC Latorraca, Rafael L Pacheco, Luciano F Drager, Geraldo Lorenzi-Filho, Rachel Riera

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 14%
Student > Master 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 7 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 10%
Neuroscience 1 5%
Unknown 8 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2022.
All research outputs
#2,391,822
of 22,532,627 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,024
of 12,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,856
of 451,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#118
of 222 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,532,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,275 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,779 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 222 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.