↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for anaemia in adults with chronic kidney disease: a network meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
13 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
320 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for anaemia in adults with chronic kidney disease: a network meta-analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010590.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suetonia C Palmer, Valeria Saglimbene, Dimitris Mavridis, Georgia Salanti, Jonathan C Craig, Marcello Tonelli, Natasha Wiebe, Giovanni FM Strippoli

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 320 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 313 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 58 18%
Student > Bachelor 41 13%
Researcher 38 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 7%
Other 53 17%
Unknown 85 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 124 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 3%
Psychology 10 3%
Other 37 12%
Unknown 97 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,100,614
of 23,130,383 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,469
of 12,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,745
of 362,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#64
of 275 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,130,383 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,377 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,691 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 275 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.