| Title |
Vaginal chlorhexidine during labour to prevent early‐onset neonatal group B streptococcal infection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003520.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Arne Ohlsson, Vibhuti S Shah, Brenda C Stade |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Canada | 1 | 11% |
| Spain | 1 | 11% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 236 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 42 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 12% |
| Researcher | 25 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 37 | 16% |
| Unknown | 70 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 87 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 23 | 10% |
| Unknown | 78 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,470,186
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,983
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,669
of 361,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#118
of 244 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,773 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.