↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Vaginal chlorhexidine during labour to prevent early-onset neonatal group B streptococcal infection

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 tweeters
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
179 Mendeley
Title
Vaginal chlorhexidine during labour to prevent early-onset neonatal group B streptococcal infection
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003520.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arne Ohlsson, Vibhuti S Shah, Brenda C Stade

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 178 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 12%
Researcher 22 12%
Student > Bachelor 20 11%
Other 13 7%
Other 31 17%
Unknown 34 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 77 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 14%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 40 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2016.
All research outputs
#1,516,438
of 17,086,389 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,841
of 11,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,697
of 312,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#105
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,086,389 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,629 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,027 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.