| Title |
Interventions for treating painful nipples among breastfeeding women
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007366.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cindy‐Lee Dennis, Kim Jackson, Jo Watson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 19 | 30% |
| Spain | 12 | 19% |
| United States | 5 | 8% |
| Belgium | 2 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 19 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 47 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 412 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 410 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 59 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 50 | 12% |
| Researcher | 38 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 24 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 6% |
| Other | 90 | 22% |
| Unknown | 127 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 100 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 95 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 5% |
| Psychology | 12 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 3% |
| Other | 38 | 9% |
| Unknown | 136 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2023.
All research outputs
#650,071
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,167
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,809
of 363,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#27
of 267 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 267 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.