↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Manual therapy for asthma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
Title
Manual therapy for asthma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2001
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001002
Pubmed ID
Authors

M A Hondras, K Linde, A P Jones

Abstract

A variety of manual therapies with similar postulated biologic mechanisms of action are commonly used to treat patients with asthma. Manual therapy practitioners are also varied, including physiotherapists, respiratory therapists, chiropractic and osteopathic physicians. A systematic review across disciplines is warranted.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Ireland 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 82 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 24%
Student > Bachelor 12 14%
Researcher 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Other 19 22%
Unknown 16 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Sports and Recreations 3 4%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 17 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2014.
All research outputs
#14,792,181
of 22,774,233 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,621
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,433
of 114,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#28
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,774,233 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.