↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Tidal versus other forms of peritoneal dialysis for acute kidney injury

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Tidal versus other forms of peritoneal dialysis for acute kidney injury
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007016.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lei Jiang, Rong Zeng, KeHu Yang, Deng Hai Mi, Jin Hui Tian, Bin Ma, Yali Liu

Abstract

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Recent studies have shown that dialysis dose was a major factor associated with patient survival. Unresolved questions persist about which mode of peritoneal dialysis (PD) should be used for most patients with AKI.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 17%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Researcher 7 9%
Professor 5 6%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 25 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Psychology 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 27 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2014.
All research outputs
#20,723,600
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,914
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,956
of 181,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#160
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.