| Title |
Tidal versus other forms of peritoneal dialysis for acute kidney injury
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007016.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lei Jiang, Rong Zeng, KeHu Yang, Deng Hai Mi, Jin Hui Tian, Bin Ma, Yali Liu |
| Abstract |
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Recent studies have shown that dialysis dose was a major factor associated with patient survival. Unresolved questions persist about which mode of peritoneal dialysis (PD) should be used for most patients with AKI. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 81 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 12% |
| Researcher | 7 | 9% |
| Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 22 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 47% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 24 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2014.
All research outputs
#18,386,678
of 22,774,233 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,427
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,090
of 167,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#147
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,774,233 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,366 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.