↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Local intramuscular transplantation of autologous mononuclear cells for critical lower limb ischaemia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
Title
Local intramuscular transplantation of autologous mononuclear cells for critical lower limb ischaemia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008347.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kasra Moazzami, Bobak Moazzami, Aria Roohi, Saharnaz Nedjat, Elena Dolmatova

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Ukraine 1 <1%
Unknown 131 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 15%
Student > Master 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Other 8 6%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 40 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 42 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2022.
All research outputs
#6,905,222
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,040
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,122
of 360,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#189
of 265 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,537 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 265 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.