| Title |
Intermittent self-dilatation for urethral stricture disease in males
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010258.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew J Jackson, Rajan Veeratterapillay, Chris K Harding, Trevor J Dorkin |
| Abstract |
Intermittent urethral self-dilatation is sometimes recommended to reduce the risk of recurrent urethral stricture. There is no consensus as to whether it is a clinically effective or cost-effective intervention in the management of this disease. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 153 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 26 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 12% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 12 | 8% |
| Researcher | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 41 | 26% |
| Unknown | 34 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 12 | 8% |
| Psychology | 10 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 24 | 15% |
| Unknown | 41 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2014.
All research outputs
#18,962,310
of 23,498,521 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,824
of 12,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#259,855
of 356,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#270
of 285 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,498,521 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 285 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.