↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Treatment for amphetamine withdrawal

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
213 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Treatment for amphetamine withdrawal
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003021.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven J Shoptaw, Uyen Kao, Keith Heinzerling, Walter Ling

Abstract

Few studies examined treatments for amphetamine withdrawal, although it is a common problem among amphetamine users. Its symptoms, in particular intense craving, may be a critical factor leading to relapse to amphetamine use. In clinical practice, medications for cocaine withdrawal are commonly used to manage amphetamine withdrawal although the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of these two illicit substances are different.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 210 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 10%
Researcher 22 10%
Unspecified 19 9%
Student > Master 19 9%
Other 55 26%
Unknown 49 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 26%
Psychology 23 11%
Unspecified 19 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 5%
Other 36 17%
Unknown 57 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 119. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2023.
All research outputs
#311,227
of 23,532,144 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#547
of 12,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#647
of 95,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,532,144 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,729 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,067 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.