↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Herbal medicine for low-back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
58 tweeters
facebook
26 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
2 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
293 Mendeley
Title
Herbal medicine for low-back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004504.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hanna Oltean, Chris Robbins, Maurits W van Tulder, Brian M Berman, Claire Bombardier, Joel J Gagnier

Abstract

Low-back pain (LBP) is a common condition and imposes a substantial economic burden upon people living in industrialized societies. A large proportion of people with chronic LBP use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), visit CAM practitioners, or both. Several herbal medicines have been purported for use in treating people with LBP. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2006.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 293 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 291 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 58 20%
Student > Bachelor 48 16%
Researcher 27 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 9%
Other 21 7%
Other 56 19%
Unknown 57 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 117 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 19 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 5%
Psychology 11 4%
Other 35 12%
Unknown 62 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2021.
All research outputs
#489,706
of 18,899,605 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,063
of 11,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,329
of 326,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,899,605 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,887 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.