↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Day centres for severe mental illness

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
6 X users
weibo
1 weibo user

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
Title
Day centres for severe mental illness
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001710.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jocelyn Sarah Catty, Tom Burns, Adelina Comas, Zoe Poole

Abstract

The number of people with severe mental illness who receive treatment whilst living at home has increased greatly over the last 30 years. Day centres and day hospitals frequently supplement this treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 112 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 11%
Student > Master 13 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Student > Postgraduate 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Other 24 21%
Unknown 36 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 26%
Psychology 15 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 10%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 40 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2022.
All research outputs
#3,637,949
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,186
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,217
of 173,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.