↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Uterine artery embolization for symptomatic uterine fibroids

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
117 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
233 Mendeley
Title
Uterine artery embolization for symptomatic uterine fibroids
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005073.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janesh K Gupta, Anju Sinha, M A Lumsden, Martha Hickey

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 233 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 230 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 34 15%
Other 30 13%
Researcher 28 12%
Student > Master 25 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 9%
Other 52 22%
Unknown 42 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 118 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 5%
Social Sciences 9 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Other 24 10%
Unknown 47 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,271,354
of 18,542,667 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,955
of 11,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,266
of 319,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#122
of 243 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,542,667 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,841 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 243 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.