↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Magnesium sulphate versus lytic cocktail for eclampsia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
313 Mendeley
Title
Magnesium sulphate versus lytic cocktail for eclampsia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002960.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lelia Duley, A Metin Gülmezoglu, Doris Chou

Abstract

Eclampsia, the occurrence of a seizure in association with pre-eclampsia, is a rare but serious complication of pregnancy. A number of different anticonvulsants have been used to control eclamptic fits and to prevent further seizures.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 313 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 308 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 16%
Student > Bachelor 42 13%
Researcher 38 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 8%
Other 64 20%
Unknown 68 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 131 42%
Psychology 26 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 8%
Social Sciences 20 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Other 27 9%
Unknown 77 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2020.
All research outputs
#2,085,764
of 17,457,801 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,757
of 11,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,573
of 312,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#120
of 244 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,457,801 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,696 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,427 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.