↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Magnesium sulphate versus lytic cocktail for eclampsia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
392 Mendeley
Title
Magnesium sulphate versus lytic cocktail for eclampsia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002960.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lelia Duley, A Metin Gülmezoglu, Doris Chou

Abstract

Eclampsia, the occurrence of a seizure in association with pre-eclampsia, is a rare but serious complication of pregnancy. A number of different anticonvulsants have been used to control eclamptic fits and to prevent further seizures.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 392 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 387 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 54 14%
Student > Bachelor 49 13%
Researcher 42 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 7%
Other 80 20%
Unknown 111 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 144 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 8%
Psychology 27 7%
Social Sciences 21 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 2%
Other 37 9%
Unknown 123 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2021.
All research outputs
#3,430,408
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,035
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,407
of 104,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#33
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,970 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.