↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Chemotherapy for children with medulloblastoma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
230 Mendeley
Title
Chemotherapy for children with medulloblastoma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006678.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erna MC Michiels, Antoinette YN Schouten-Van Meeteren, François Doz, Geert O Janssens, Elvira C van Dalen

Abstract

Post-surgical radiotherapy (RT) in combination with chemotherapy is considered as standard of care for medulloblastoma in children. Chemotherapy has been introduced to improve survival and to reduce RT-induced adverse effects. Reduction of RT-induced adverse effects was achieved by deleting (craniospinal) RT in very young children and by diminishing the dose and field to the craniospinal axis and reducing the boost volume to the tumour bed in older children.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 229 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 41 18%
Student > Master 28 12%
Researcher 22 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 7%
Other 15 7%
Other 35 15%
Unknown 72 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 85 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Neuroscience 8 3%
Other 28 12%
Unknown 77 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2023.
All research outputs
#3,213,496
of 23,743,910 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,973
of 12,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,979
of 356,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#135
of 277 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,743,910 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,753 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 277 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.