↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Chemotherapy for children with medulloblastoma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
13 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
192 Mendeley
Title
Chemotherapy for children with medulloblastoma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006678.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erna MC Michiels, Antoinette YN Schouten-Van Meeteren, François Doz, Geert O Janssens, Elvira C van Dalen

Abstract

Post-surgical radiotherapy (RT) in combination with chemotherapy is considered as standard of care for medulloblastoma in children. Chemotherapy has been introduced to improve survival and to reduce RT-induced adverse effects. Reduction of RT-induced adverse effects was achieved by deleting (craniospinal) RT in very young children and by diminishing the dose and field to the craniospinal axis and reducing the boost volume to the tumour bed in older children.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 191 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 35 18%
Student > Master 27 14%
Researcher 21 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 8%
Other 10 5%
Other 31 16%
Unknown 52 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Neuroscience 6 3%
Other 26 14%
Unknown 57 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2021.
All research outputs
#2,561,851
of 20,842,105 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,257
of 12,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,988
of 340,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#123
of 243 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,842,105 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,203 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 243 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.