↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Non-immunosuppressive treatment for IgA nephropathy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Non-immunosuppressive treatment for IgA nephropathy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003962.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sharon Reid, Peggy M Cawthon, Jonathan C Craig, Joshua A Samuels, Donald A Molony, Giovanni FM Strippoli

Abstract

IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is the most common primary glomerular disease with approximately 30% to 40% of patients progressing to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) within 20 years. The most common regimens include immunosuppressive agents, however the risks of long-term treatment often outweigh the potential benefits. Non-immunosuppressive options, including fish oils, anticoagulants, antihypertensive agents and tonsillectomy have also been examined but not reviewed systematically.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 163 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 17%
Researcher 27 16%
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Student > Postgraduate 16 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 9%
Other 36 21%
Unknown 27 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 89 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Computer Science 4 2%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 35 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2016.
All research outputs
#10,152,953
of 17,353,889 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,480
of 11,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,743
of 311,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#208
of 244 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,353,889 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,785 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.