↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Non‐immunosuppressive treatment for IgA nephropathy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Non‐immunosuppressive treatment for IgA nephropathy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003962.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sharon Reid, Peggy M Cawthon, Jonathan C Craig, Joshua A Samuels, Donald A Molony, Giovanni FM Strippoli

Abstract

IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is the most common primary glomerular disease with approximately 30% to 40% of patients progressing to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) within 20 years. The most common regimens include immunosuppressive agents, however the risks of long-term treatment often outweigh the potential benefits. Non-immunosuppressive options, including fish oils, anticoagulants, antihypertensive agents and tonsillectomy have also been examined but not reviewed systematically.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 179 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 15%
Researcher 24 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 9%
Student > Bachelor 17 9%
Student > Postgraduate 15 8%
Other 34 18%
Unknown 49 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 86 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Psychology 4 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 59 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2016.
All research outputs
#16,292,673
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,226
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,914
of 120,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#85
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.