| Title |
Case management approaches to home support for people with dementia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008345.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Siobhan Reilly, Claudia Miranda-Castillo, Reem Malouf, Juanita Hoe, Sandeep Toot, David Challis, Martin Orrell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 16 | 28% |
| Chile | 4 | 7% |
| Spain | 3 | 5% |
| Ireland | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 27 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 45 | 79% |
| Scientists | 6 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 800 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 791 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 133 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 91 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 88 | 11% |
| Researcher | 81 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 41 | 5% |
| Other | 137 | 17% |
| Unknown | 229 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 165 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 148 | 19% |
| Psychology | 79 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 55 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 13 | 2% |
| Other | 87 | 11% |
| Unknown | 253 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2021.
All research outputs
#741,682
of 24,758,493 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,432
of 12,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,712
of 363,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#32
of 283 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,758,493 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,231 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 283 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.