↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Mailuoning for acute ischaemic stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
Title
Mailuoning for acute ischaemic stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007028.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Weimin Yang, Zhaobo Shi, Hong-Qi Yang, Junfang Teng, Jun Zhao, Guoliang Xiang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 80 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 23%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 19%
Neuroscience 6 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 6%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 20 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2015.
All research outputs
#11,072,789
of 14,574,779 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,872
of 11,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,141
of 298,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#233
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,574,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,001 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.