↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Antibiotics for community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections secondary to Mycoplasma pneumoniae in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
10 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
214 Mendeley
Title
Antibiotics for community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections secondary to Mycoplasma pneumoniae in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004875.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Samantha J Gardiner, John B Gavranich, Anne B Chang

Abstract

Mycoplasma pneumoniae (M. pneumoniae) is widely recognised as an important cause of community-acquired lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) in children. Pulmonary manifestations are typically tracheobronchitis or pneumonia but M. pneumoniae is also implicated in wheezing episodes in both asthmatic and non-asthmatic individuals. Although antibiotics are used to treat LRTIs, a review of several major textbooks offers conflicting advice for using antibiotics in the management of M. pneumoniae LRTI in children.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 212 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 31 14%
Student > Master 23 11%
Other 21 10%
Researcher 16 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 7%
Other 55 26%
Unknown 52 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 89 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Unspecified 7 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 22 10%
Unknown 68 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2022.
All research outputs
#2,721,433
of 23,571,271 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,487
of 12,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,774
of 355,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#126
of 286 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,571,271 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 286 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.