↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

First-line drugs inhibiting the renin angiotensin system versus other first-line antihypertensive drug classes for hypertension

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
50 tweeters
facebook
6 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
First-line drugs inhibiting the renin angiotensin system versus other first-line antihypertensive drug classes for hypertension
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008170.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hao Xue, Zhuang Lu, Wen Lu Tang, Lu Wei Pang, Gan Mi Wang, Gavin WK Wong, James M Wright

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 126 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 21%
Researcher 21 16%
Student > Bachelor 19 15%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 27 21%
Unknown 16 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 58%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 18 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2018.
All research outputs
#782,688
of 16,521,458 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,096
of 11,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,471
of 309,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#57
of 245 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,521,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,524 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 245 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.