| Title |
First‐line drugs inhibiting the renin angiotensin system versus other first‐line antihypertensive drug classes for hypertension
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008170.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hao Xue, Zhuang Lu, Wen Lu Tang, Lu Wei Pang, Gan Mi Wang, Gavin WK Wong, James M Wright |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 16 | 33% |
| Canada | 3 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 2% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 26 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 39 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 136 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 27 | 19% |
| Researcher | 22 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 26 | 19% |
| Unknown | 25 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 76 | 54% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Unknown | 26 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2018.
All research outputs
#1,284,242
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,716
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,929
of 358,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#63
of 279 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 279 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.