↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Early versus late tracheostomy for critically ill patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
234 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
417 Mendeley
Title
Early versus late tracheostomy for critically ill patients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007271.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brenda NG Andriolo, Regis B Andriolo, Humberto Saconato, Álvaro N Atallah, Orsine Valente

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 417 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
United States 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 411 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 51 12%
Student > Master 51 12%
Researcher 48 12%
Other 43 10%
Student > Bachelor 39 9%
Other 86 21%
Unknown 99 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 197 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 38 9%
Psychology 10 2%
Social Sciences 8 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 1%
Other 36 9%
Unknown 122 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,968,331
of 21,546,315 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,385
of 12,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,824
of 344,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#106
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,546,315 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,070 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.