| Title |
Early versus late tracheostomy for critically ill patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007271.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brenda NG Andriolo, Regis B Andriolo, Humberto Saconato, Álvaro N Atallah, Orsine Valente |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 29% |
| Japan | 2 | 14% |
| Norway | 1 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 480 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 474 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 64 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 52 | 11% |
| Other | 51 | 11% |
| Researcher | 49 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 43 | 9% |
| Other | 93 | 19% |
| Unknown | 128 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 213 | 44% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 42 | 9% |
| Engineering | 10 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 2% |
| Psychology | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 43 | 9% |
| Unknown | 152 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,117,706
of 22,778,347 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,573
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,579
of 352,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#111
of 280 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,778,347 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 280 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.