The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Beta-adrenergic blockers for perioperative cardiac risk reduction in people undergoing vascular surgery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006342.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katayoun Mostafaie, Rachel Bedenis, Darrell Harrington |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Egypt | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | 11% |
| Australia | 1 | 11% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 163 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 7% |
| Researcher | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 30 | 18% |
| Unknown | 65 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 12% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Unknown | 67 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2020.
All research outputs
#5,720,257
of 26,536,755 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,783
of 13,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,920
of 365,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#165
of 281 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,536,755 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,242 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 281 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.