| Title |
Parent-infant psychotherapy for improving parental and infant mental health
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010534.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jane Barlow, Cathy Bennett, Nick Midgley, Soili K Larkin, Yinghui Wei |
| Abstract |
Parent-infant psychotherapy (PIP) is a dyadic intervention that works with parent and infant together, with the aim of improving the parent-infant relationship and promoting infant attachment and optimal infant development. PIP aims to achieve this by targeting the mother's view of her infant, which may be affected by her own experiences, and linking them to her current relationship to her child, in order to improve the parent-infant relationship directly. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 45% |
| Sweden | 1 | 5% |
| Portugal | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| Guernsey | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 55% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 30% |
| Scientists | 3 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 755 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 752 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 131 | 17% |
| Researcher | 90 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 76 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 74 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 48 | 6% |
| Other | 129 | 17% |
| Unknown | 207 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 181 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 140 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 81 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 52 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 12 | 2% |
| Other | 64 | 8% |
| Unknown | 225 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,224,426
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,690
of 12,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,768
of 361,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#62
of 284 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,911 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,440 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 284 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.