↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Parent-infant psychotherapy for improving parental and infant mental health

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
24 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
590 Mendeley
Title
Parent-infant psychotherapy for improving parental and infant mental health
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010534.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jane Barlow, Cathy Bennett, Nick Midgley, Soili K Larkin, Yinghui Wei

Abstract

Parent-infant psychotherapy (PIP) is a dyadic intervention that works with parent and infant together, with the aim of improving the parent-infant relationship and promoting infant attachment and optimal infant development. PIP aims to achieve this by targeting the mother's view of her infant, which may be affected by her own experiences, and linking them to her current relationship to her child, in order to improve the parent-infant relationship directly.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 590 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 587 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 119 20%
Researcher 75 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 11%
Student > Bachelor 58 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 47 8%
Other 110 19%
Unknown 118 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 164 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 125 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 67 11%
Social Sciences 47 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 2%
Other 44 7%
Unknown 134 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2017.
All research outputs
#1,005,481
of 17,819,859 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,593
of 11,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,765
of 315,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#65
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,819,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,777 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.