↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for chronic pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
Title
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for chronic pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003222.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kelechi E Nnoaham, Jharna Kumbang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 82 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 13%
Researcher 7 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 22 26%
Unknown 23 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Psychology 6 7%
Neuroscience 5 6%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 26 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2015.
All research outputs
#20,249,662
of 22,778,347 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,991
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,508
of 225,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#226
of 229 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,778,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,844 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 229 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.