↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Vaginal preparation with antiseptic solution before cesarean section for preventing postoperative infections

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
10 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Vaginal preparation with antiseptic solution before cesarean section for preventing postoperative infections
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007892.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Haas, David M, Morgan, Sarah, Contreras, Karenrose, David M Haas, Sarah Morgan, Karenrose Contreras

Abstract

Cesarean delivery is one of the most common surgical procedures performed by obstetricians. Infectious morbidity after cesarean delivery can have a tremendous impact on the postpartum woman's return to normal function and her ability to care for her baby. Despite the widespread use of prophylactic antibiotics, postoperative infectious morbidity still complicates cesarean deliveries.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 24%
Student > Master 6 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 15%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Other 7 21%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 15%
Arts and Humanities 2 6%
Psychology 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 5 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2019.
All research outputs
#962,885
of 17,365,229 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,530
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,359
of 295,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#63
of 245 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,365,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,614 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 245 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.