↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Lycopene for the prevention of prostate cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
7 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
227 Mendeley
Title
Lycopene for the prevention of prostate cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008007.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dragan Ilic, Kristian M Forbes, Craig Hassed

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 220 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 49 22%
Student > Master 44 19%
Researcher 19 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 7%
Student > Postgraduate 16 7%
Other 47 21%
Unknown 35 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 73 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 3%
Other 31 14%
Unknown 44 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2019.
All research outputs
#781,914
of 16,470,846 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,103
of 11,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,760
of 292,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#58
of 247 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,470,846 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,507 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 247 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.