↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Exercise for treating patellofemoral pain syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
140 tweeters
facebook
16 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
574 Mendeley
Title
Exercise for treating patellofemoral pain syndrome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010387.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rianne A van der Heijden, Nienke E Lankhorst, Robbart van Linschoten, Sita MA Bierma-Zeinstra, Marienke van Middelkoop

Abstract

Patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) is a common knee problem, which particularly affects adolescents and young adults. PFPS, which is characterised by retropatellar (behind the kneecap) or peripatellar (around the kneecap) pain, is often referred to as anterior knee pain. The pain mostly occurs when load is put on the knee extensor mechanism when climbing stairs, squatting, running, cycling or sitting with flexed knees. Exercise therapy is often prescribed for this condition.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 140 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 574 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
France 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 563 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 127 22%
Student > Bachelor 112 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 10%
Student > Postgraduate 46 8%
Researcher 39 7%
Other 89 16%
Unknown 105 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 177 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 124 22%
Sports and Recreations 55 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 3%
Psychology 15 3%
Other 52 9%
Unknown 135 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 97. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2020.
All research outputs
#274,737
of 18,552,435 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#534
of 11,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,406
of 303,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 250 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,552,435 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,835 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,303 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 250 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.