The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Different strategies for diagnosing gestational diabetes to improve maternal and infant health.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007122.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Farrar D, Duley L, Medley N, Lawlor DA, Farrar, Diane, Duley, Lelia, Medley, Nancy, Lawlor, Debbie A |
| Abstract |
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is carbohydrate intolerance resulting in hyperglycaemia with onset or first recognition during pregnancy. If untreated, perinatal morbidity and mortality may be increased. Accurate diagnosis allows appropriate treatment. Use of different tests and different criteria will influence which women are diagnosed with GDM. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
| France | 1 | 17% |
| Italy | 1 | 17% |
| Colombia | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 165 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 33 | 19% |
| Researcher | 23 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 13% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 34 | 20% |
| Unknown | 33 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 76 | 44% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 6% |
| Psychology | 9 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Unknown | 38 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2017.
All research outputs
#3,468,646
of 23,835,032 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,246
of 12,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,669
of 356,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#144
of 287 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,835,032 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,760 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,378 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 287 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.