↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Macrolides for diffuse panbronchiolitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Macrolides for diffuse panbronchiolitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007716.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiufang Lin, Jing Lu, Ming Yang, Bi Rong Dong, Hong Mei Wu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 24%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Researcher 4 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 5%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 24 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 26 39%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2022.
All research outputs
#6,443,364
of 22,888,307 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,242
of 12,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,964
of 352,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#195
of 284 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,888,307 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,332 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 284 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.