↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Macrolides for diffuse panbronchiolitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
Macrolides for diffuse panbronchiolitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007716.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiufang Lin, Jing Lu, Ming Yang, Bi Rong Dong, Hong Mei Wu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 28%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Researcher 4 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 18 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 19 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2019.
All research outputs
#4,542,948
of 15,807,159 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,211
of 11,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,831
of 289,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#175
of 245 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,807,159 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,294 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.5. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,035 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 245 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.