↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Exercise therapy for treatment of non-specific low back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
626 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
711 Mendeley
Title
Exercise therapy for treatment of non-specific low back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000335.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jill Hayden, Maurits W van Tulder, Antti Malmivaara, Bart W Koes

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 711 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 5 <1%
Unknown 688 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 130 18%
Student > Bachelor 124 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 8%
Researcher 55 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 50 7%
Other 165 23%
Unknown 131 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 243 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 135 19%
Sports and Recreations 52 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 3%
Social Sciences 17 2%
Other 83 12%
Unknown 158 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2021.
All research outputs
#623,144
of 21,026,901 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,333
of 12,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,550
of 320,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#34
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,026,901 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,068 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,198 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.