↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Exercise therapy for treatment of non‐specific low back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
720 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
807 Mendeley
Title
Exercise therapy for treatment of non‐specific low back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000335.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jill Hayden, Maurits W van Tulder, Antti Malmivaara, Bart W Koes

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 807 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 786 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 126 16%
Student > Bachelor 126 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 64 8%
Other 56 7%
Researcher 56 7%
Other 159 20%
Unknown 220 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 234 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 144 18%
Sports and Recreations 60 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 3%
Social Sciences 16 2%
Other 85 11%
Unknown 245 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 118. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2024.
All research outputs
#366,993
of 26,069,033 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#599
of 13,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#387
of 70,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,069,033 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,184 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,083 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.