↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Prophylactic caffeine to prevent postoperative apnoea following general anaesthesia in preterm infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
Title
Prophylactic caffeine to prevent postoperative apnoea following general anaesthesia in preterm infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2001
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000048
Pubmed ID
Authors

David J Henderson-Smart, Peter A Steer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 101 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 16%
Other 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Researcher 7 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 7%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 32 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Psychology 4 4%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 <1%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 35 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2019.
All research outputs
#7,451,584
of 22,780,967 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,941
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,413
of 43,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 43,873 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.