↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
343 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
564 Mendeley
Title
Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005960.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicholas GH Mohtadi, Denise S Chan, Katie N Dainty, Daniel B Whelan

Abstract

Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) commonly involves patellar tendon (PT) or hamstring tendon(s) (HT) autografts. There is no consensus with respect to the choice between these two grafts in ACL surgery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 564 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 551 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 95 17%
Student > Master 82 15%
Researcher 50 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 9%
Student > Postgraduate 41 7%
Other 98 17%
Unknown 150 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 214 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 52 9%
Sports and Recreations 42 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 4%
Engineering 20 4%
Other 45 8%
Unknown 171 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2023.
All research outputs
#4,593,373
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,753
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,182
of 136,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#49
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,570 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.