↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
513 Mendeley
Title
Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005960.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicholas GH Mohtadi, Denise S Chan, Katie N Dainty, Daniel B Whelan

Abstract

Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) commonly involves patellar tendon (PT) or hamstring tendon(s) (HT) autografts. There is no consensus with respect to the choice between these two grafts in ACL surgery.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 513 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 500 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 89 17%
Student > Master 78 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 9%
Researcher 45 9%
Student > Postgraduate 40 8%
Other 95 19%
Unknown 119 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 199 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 49 10%
Sports and Recreations 40 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 4%
Engineering 18 4%
Other 46 9%
Unknown 141 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2021.
All research outputs
#6,277,725
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,086
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,079
of 125,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#59
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.