↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Monoaminergic agonists for acute traumatic brain injury

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Monoaminergic agonists for acute traumatic brain injury
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2006
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003984.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rob J Forsyth, Beena Jayamoni, Tom C Paine, Sandra Mascarenhas

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 1%
Unknown 85 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 18%
Researcher 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 7%
Librarian 6 7%
Other 24 27%
Unknown 18 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 37%
Psychology 10 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Sports and Recreations 3 3%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 23 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2020.
All research outputs
#5,691,710
of 17,575,102 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,153
of 11,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,069
of 297,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#182
of 243 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,575,102 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,713 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 243 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.