↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Short term urinary catheter policies following urogenital surgery in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
17 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
Title
Short term urinary catheter policies following urogenital surgery in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2006
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004374.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon Phipps, Yik N Lim, Samuel McClinton, Chris Barry, Ajay Rane, James MO N'Dow

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Singapore 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 119 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 16%
Researcher 15 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 11%
Student > Master 13 11%
Other 12 10%
Other 26 21%
Unknown 23 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 30 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2022.
All research outputs
#7,557,593
of 23,053,169 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,020
of 12,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,383
of 66,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,053,169 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,360 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.9. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.