↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Wound drains following thyroid surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
122 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
Title
Wound drains following thyroid surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006099.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kumarakrishnan Samraj, Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 125 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 13%
Other 16 13%
Student > Master 15 12%
Researcher 13 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Other 32 25%
Unknown 24 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Psychology 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 28 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2020.
All research outputs
#5,085,382
of 16,968,502 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,638
of 11,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,518
of 414,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#152
of 205 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,968,502 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,600 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.5. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 414,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 205 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.