↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Addition of long‐acting beta2‐agonists to inhaled corticosteroids versus same dose inhaled corticosteroids for chronic asthma in adults and children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
16 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
160 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
280 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Addition of long‐acting beta2‐agonists to inhaled corticosteroids versus same dose inhaled corticosteroids for chronic asthma in adults and children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005535.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francine M Ducharme, Muireann Ni Chroinin, Ilana Greenstone, Toby J Lasserson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 280 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 272 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 15%
Researcher 35 13%
Student > Bachelor 29 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 9%
Other 22 8%
Other 52 19%
Unknown 75 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 121 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 4%
Social Sciences 9 3%
Psychology 7 3%
Other 31 11%
Unknown 80 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2021.
All research outputs
#3,303,084
of 25,540,105 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,081
of 13,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,535
of 104,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,540,105 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,002 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.