↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Addition of long-acting beta2-agonists to inhaled corticosteroids versus same dose inhaled corticosteroids for chronic asthma in adults and children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
15 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
155 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
270 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Addition of long-acting beta2-agonists to inhaled corticosteroids versus same dose inhaled corticosteroids for chronic asthma in adults and children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005535.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francine M Ducharme, Muireann Ni Chroinin, Ilana Greenstone, Toby J Lasserson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 270 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 262 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 15%
Researcher 31 11%
Student > Bachelor 30 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 9%
Other 22 8%
Other 58 21%
Unknown 65 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 118 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 8%
Social Sciences 9 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 3%
Psychology 7 3%
Other 38 14%
Unknown 68 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2021.
All research outputs
#2,815,023
of 22,780,967 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,498
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,972
of 95,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,967 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,037 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.