The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 332 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
| Title |
Effectiveness of vocational rehabilitation intervention on the return to work and employment of persons with multiple sclerosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007256.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fary Khan, Louisa Ng, Lynne Turner‐Stokes |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 325 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 43 | 13% |
| Researcher | 42 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 5% |
| Other | 63 | 19% |
| Unknown | 101 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 72 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 28 | 8% |
| Psychology | 26 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 56 | 17% |
| Unknown | 108 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2019.
All research outputs
#8,738,637
of 25,870,940 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,724
of 13,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,383
of 187,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#45
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,870,940 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.