| Title |
Empiric antibiotic coverage of atypical pathogens for community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004418.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Noa Eliakim-Raz, Eyal Robenshtok, Daphna Shefet, Anat Gafter-Gvili, Liat Vidal, Mical Paul, Leonard Leibovici |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 244 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 11% |
| Researcher | 25 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 9% |
| Other | 20 | 8% |
| Other | 54 | 22% |
| Unknown | 62 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 120 | 49% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 9% |
| Unknown | 72 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,502,286
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,441
of 12,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,665
of 168,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#57
of 226 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 226 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.