↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Empiric antibiotic coverage of atypical pathogens for community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
204 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Empiric antibiotic coverage of atypical pathogens for community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004418.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Noa Eliakim-Raz, Eyal Robenshtok, Daphna Shefet, Anat Gafter-Gvili, Liat Vidal, Mical Paul, Leonard Leibovici

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 201 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 13%
Student > Master 27 13%
Researcher 26 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 9%
Other 18 9%
Other 52 25%
Unknown 35 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 107 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 2%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 43 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,142,690
of 17,773,620 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,933
of 11,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,305
of 299,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#70
of 243 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,773,620 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,760 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,303 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 243 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.