↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Minimally invasive versus open surgery for reversal of tubal sterilization

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
Title
Minimally invasive versus open surgery for reversal of tubal sterilization
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009174.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Korula George, Mohan S Kamath, Prathap Tharyan

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 72 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 22%
Student > Bachelor 12 17%
Student > Master 11 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 13 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 36%
Social Sciences 8 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 10%
Psychology 4 6%
Computer Science 3 4%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 16 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2018.
All research outputs
#1,947,090
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,292
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,016
of 380,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#72
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 380,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.