↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Regular treatment with salmeterol for chronic asthma: serious adverse events

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
18 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
177 Mendeley
connotea
3 Connotea
Title
Regular treatment with salmeterol for chronic asthma: serious adverse events
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006363.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher J Cates, Matthew J Cates

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Tunisia 1 <1%
Unknown 175 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Researcher 14 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 8%
Student > Postgraduate 11 6%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 70 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 10%
Psychology 8 5%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 73 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2020.
All research outputs
#4,169,731
of 22,780,967 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,623
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,761
of 81,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,967 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.